First, Look at the Price Path
The lock-up releases did not all occur on the same day. According to media statistics from Hong Kong Stock Decoder (港股解码), approximately 25.6816 million cornerstone investor shares of Zhipu were released on July 8, accounting for about 5.76% of the total share capital; approximately 146 million shares of MiniMax were released on July 9, accounting for about 46.44% of the total share capital, with its freely tradable shares prior to the release being less than 6%. This is a media statistic, not a company disclosure of actual reductions. It illustrates the magnitude differences in potential supply, but does not prove that these shares were sold on that day.
The daily chart first provides an overview. On July 9, the first trading day after the lock-up expiry, Zhipu closed higher while MiniMax-W closed lower; by July 10, both stocks declined, with Zhipu showing a larger trading volume and a bigger drop at close.
| Date | Company | Open | High | Low | Close | Change | Turnover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8 | Zhipu | 1,563.0 | 1,918.0 | 1,450.0 | 1,825.0 | +13.35% | N/A in this article |
| Jul 8 | MiniMax-W | 323.8 | 389.8 | 311.0 | 362.6 | +12.0% | N/A in this article |
| Jul 9 | Zhipu | 1,879.0 | 2,222.0 | 1,803.0 | 2,032.0 | +11.34% | N/A in this article |
| Jul 9 | MiniMax-W | 359.8 | 397.4 | 283.8 | 297.4 | -17.98% | N/A in this article |
| Jul 10 | Zhipu | 1,850.0 | 1,999.0 | 1,597.0 | 1,640.0 | -19.29% | Approx. HKD 13.260 billion |
| Jul 10 | MiniMax-W | 280.4 | 291.6 | 248.4 | 268.6 | -9.68% | Approx. HKD 3.594 billion |
The price unit is in HKD; the change percentage is calculated based on the previous trading day’s closing price. The data comes from the Tencent Finance market data API. The number and percentage of unlocked shares are from the aforementioned media statistics, which are from different sources and use different calibers than the daily line data.
The two narratives diverged at different points in the trading session. MiniMax-W suffered steeper declines in the morning and early afternoon before staging a recovery, while Zhipu failed to follow with a rebound in the afternoon and continued to move lower toward the close.
| As of July 10 | Zhipu Price / Change vs Previous Close | MiniMax-W Price / Change vs Previous Close | The Side with the Deeper Drop at the Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9:31 | 1,946.0 / -4.23% | 278.4 / -6.39% | MiniMax-W |
| 11:32 | 1,790.0 / -11.91% | 251.4 / -15.47% | MiniMax-W |
| 13:42 | Prices at the same timestamp not listed in this article | 248.6 / -16.41% | MiniMax-W near intraday low |
| 14:48 | 1,698.0 / -16.44% | 276.2 / -7.13% | Zhipu |
| Close | 1,640.0 / -19.29% | 268.6 / -9.68% | Zhipu |
This table illustrates the sequence of price movements, but does not establish causality. Unless there is verifiable evidence with timestamps, such as orders or the spread of news, a specific intraday turning point cannot be attributed to financing news, nor can actual reductions in holdings be inferred from the scale of unlocked shares.
The Price of New Money, and the Price of Old Money
MiniMax’s July 10 announcement is for a set of transactions yet to be completed: a proposed placement of 35.6 million new Class A shares, plus a HK$6.5 billion zero-coupon guaranteed convertible bond. Zhipu’s July 9 announcement, on the other hand, is a best-effort placement of 19.78 million new H shares, with the announcement explicitly noting that the transaction may not be completed.
The IPO has been completed; the Hong Kong stock follow-on financing in the table below remains a proposed transaction. The status column is intentionally shown separately to avoid treating the estimated net proceeds from the announcement as the existing cash balance.
| Company | Item | Status | Price and Amount | Use of Proceeds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax-W | IPO | Completed | Offer price HK$165; gross/net proceeds from the base offering approximately HK$4.8176 billion / HK$4.5961 billion; net proceeds approximately HK$5.29339 billion assuming full exercise of the over-allotment option | R&D 90%, working capital 10% |
| Zhipu | IPO | Completed | Offer price HK$116.20; gross/net proceeds from the base offering approximately HK$4.3481 billion / HK$4.1734 billion; net proceeds approximately HK$4.8962 billion assuming full exercise of the over-allotment option | General-purpose large model R&D 70%, MaaS 10%, partner network and strategic investments 10%, working capital 10% |
| MiniMax-W | New Class A Share Placement | Proposed, subject to conditions | 35.6 million shares at HK$268 per share; gross/net proceeds approximately HK$9.5408 billion / HK$9.49141 billion | Of the net proceeds combined with the convertible bonds, 80% is intended for AI infrastructure and model R&D, 10% for global expansion, 10% for working capital and general purposes |
| MiniMax-W | Zero-Coupon Guaranteed Convertible Bonds | Proposed, subject to conditions | Principal HK$6.5 billion, maturing in 2027; initial conversion price HK$335; net proceeds approximately HK$6.4658 billion; approximately 19.403 million new shares on a full-conversion scenario | Same as above |
| Zhipu (the HKEX announcement entity is Knowledge Atlas) | New H Share Best-Efforts Placement | Proposed, may not be completed | 19.78 million shares at HK$1,588 per share; gross/net proceeds approximately HK$31.41064 billion / HK$31.37495 billion | Model R&D talent, computing power and related technical services; business expansion and strategic investments; capital structure and general working capital. Planned to be used by the end of 2027 |
If both MiniMax transactions are completed, the combined gross amount will be approximately HK$16.0408 billion, and the net amount will be approximately HK$15.9572 billion. This figure is roughly three times its IPO net proceeds after the full exercise of the over-allotment option. Zhipu’s proposed placement net amount is approximately 6.4 times its IPO net proceeds on the same basis. The numbers are large, but they do not automatically carry positive implications: money can extend the investment cycle, but it also makes the future cash return per share a more stringent question.
The placement price reflects the conditions under which the financing was negotiated, rather than the company’s overall valuation or target price. MiniMax-W’s placement price of HK$268 represents a 9.89% discount to the closing price of HK$297.4 on July 9; Zhipu’s placement price of HK$1,588 represents a 12.99% discount to the closing price of HK$1,825 on July 8. Differences in announcement disclosures, comparison benchmarks, and transaction methods mean this cannot be used to compare “which company received a steeper discount from the market.”
Convertible bonds also carry an additional layer of debt attributes, maturity, and conversion options. The initial conversion price of HKD 335 cannot be placed alongside the ordinary share placement price and treated directly as the market’s valuation conclusion for MiniMax. The secondary market closing price is merely the marginal transaction price under that day’s circulating supply, risk appetite, and information set — it does not represent the overall pricing the company obtained at the time of financing.
Implied equity value with similar IPO timing, later placed into different deal structures
Based on the IPO offering price multiplied by the number of shares issued after the IPO, the implied equity value of MiniMax is approximately HK$51.75 billion, while that of Zhipu is approximately HK$51.80 billion. This calculation merely reflects the equity prices derived from the two offerings at a unified IPO time point, and cannot serve as a substitute for subsequent market capitalization, nor should it be regarded as an official post-money valuation.
These two closely matched starting points help frame this week’s refinancing. The package offered by MiniMax is a combination of common stock and convertible bonds: one portion forms new shares after closing and issuance, while the other portion starts as debt, with future conversion depending on the terms and the holder’s choice. Zhipu is a best-efforts placement of a large amount of common stock, where the uncertainty around the new shares being issued and the completion of the financing is more directly placed on the trading table.
The market’s response on such announcement days isn’t simply answering the question of “whether anyone is willing to put up money.” It also weighs simultaneously the newly tradable or potential shares, the discount on the financing, whether the financing completes smoothly, the speed of capital deployment, and the demand for liquidity from existing shareholders after the lock-up expires. MiniMax faces a significantly larger potential supply of floating shares; Zhipu, meanwhile, confronts a best-efforts placement whose size far exceeds its IPO. These are testable backgrounds that explain the divergence—not a single-factor attribution for the moves on July 10.
There is still one more round for A-shares, but the amount cannot be factored in in advance
Both companies have disclosed the proposed RMB share matters, with varying progress and levels of information.
| Company | Disclosed Matters | What Can Now Be Confirmed |
|---|---|---|
| MiniMax-W | Announcement on May 31 of proposed issuance of RMB shares | Scale, amount, use, or completion timeline have not been disclosed, and it is explicitly stated that implementation is not guaranteed |
| Zhipu | Announcement on June 1 of proposed issuance of no more than 38,768,964 new A-shares on the STAR Market, excluding over-allotment | Pricing is undetermined and no formal agreement has been reached; the RMB 15 billion represents the total planned project investment, not funds already raised. Of this, RMB 12 billion is for the general-purpose foundation large model, RMB 2 billion for MaaS, and RMB 1 billion for supplementing working capital |
Adding the 15 billion yuan from this table to the cash Zhipu already holds is a common misreading. It is a project investment plan; whether the offering can actually proceed, at what price, and how much is ultimately raised still depends on subsequent procedures and disclosures. MiniMax’s announcement information is at an even earlier stage, and has not even provided the planned amount or use of proceeds.
LLM Funding Burns On — What Is the Market Watching Now?
The use of funds by large model companies is highly similar: models, compute, infrastructure, products, and globalization. The same destinations do not mean the same output. At this stage, the market’s judgment on financing has at least four sequential layers:
- Whether the transaction can be completed and what the actual net amount is;
- How the cash balance and future commitments on compute, training, and inference will change;
- How newly issued shares and potential convertible shares alter per-share equity;
- Whether revenue, gross margin, cash burn, and unit compute efficiency improve.
Refinancing allows the company to continue betting on next-generation models, and it also pushes the validation cycle to the next financial report and the next capital structure disclosure. The mid-session seesaw followed by a same-direction decline at the close on July 10 is only one slice. The true repricing will not get an answer until cash turns into sustainable revenue.
This article does not constitute investment advice.
References
- Tencent Finance: Zhipu 02513 Daily and Intraday Quotes; Intraday API.
- Tencent Finance: MiniMax-W 00100 Daily and Intraday Quotes; Intraday API.
- Hong Kong Stocks Decoded: Lock-up Expiry Schedule and Float Statistics for Both Companies. Compiled from media reports; not used as actual disposal data.
- MiniMax: Announcement of Proposed Placing and Proposed Issuance of Convertible Bonds on July 10, 2026.
- Zhipu Related Entities: Announcement of Proposed Placing of New H Shares on July 9, 2026.
- MiniMax: Final IPO Offer Price and Allocation Results; Announcement of Proposed Issuance of RMB Shares.
- Zhipu Related Entities: Final IPO Offer Price and Allocation Results; Announcement of Proposed Issuance of A Shares on the STAR Market.
写作附记
This article is written based on Hong Kong Stock Exchange announcements, market data interfaces, and clearly labeled media statistics. Refinancing and A-share matters are handled according to the proposed status at the time of announcement; lock-up release statistics are not equivalent to actual selling, and intraday price paths do not constitute news-causality proof.
Original Prompt
Zhipu and Minimax faced their first lock-up expiry wave last week. Previous articles have covered related topics, but when the moment actually arrived, the two stocks performed quite differently — Zhipu rose while Minimax fell. We will analyze why. Subsequently, financing news came out; intraday, Minimax still declined more, but by the close, Zhipu suffered a sharp drop. A table summarizes the relevant market data.
Reviewing the IPO financing scale, with the newly announced financing amounts this week, we examine how the market is pricing these two companies. There is still a subsequent round of A-share financing, along with the intended use of funds raised by both companies. With large model financing continuing to burn cash, we look at how the market views this.
Comments will load when you scroll here.